The Gelugpa Mainstream in the West

In 1965, a Russian-American socialite named Zina Rachevsky arrived in Nepal looking for something she could not have named precisely. She found two Tibetan monks in exile — Lama Thubten Yeshe and his young student Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche — living at a small gompa on the hills northeast of Kathmandu. She asked to study with them. They said yes. Within a few years, other Western seekers began arriving at the same hills, drawn by the same hunger and by the news that these two monks could actually teach — not in the formal, institutional sense that required years of preparation and Tibetan language, but in a direct, psychologically fluent, accessible sense that met Western minds where they were.

What Lama Yeshe and Lama Zopa began at Kopan Monastery in 1971 — the annual "One-Month Meditation Course," open to any Western practitioner regardless of prior training — became the template for accessible Dharma education that would spread across the world. The Foundation for the Preservation of the Mahayana Tradition, formally constituted in 1975, is the institutional heir of that original gesture of openness: a network that by the time of its second teacher's death in 2023 encompassed 138 centers, projects, and services in thirty-four countries, a publishing house, a free-distribution teaching archive, and a curriculum producing the first Western-trained Buddhist scholars in the Gelugpa tradition.

The FPMT is not a simple story of success. It contains, within its fifty-year arc, the most instructive cross-cultural experiment in Tibetan Buddhist history — the attempt to recognize and train a Western child as the reincarnation of its founding teacher — and some of the most troubling documented failures of institutional accountability in Western Buddhism. To understand the FPMT is to understand both what Tibetan Buddhism can transmit across cultural distance, and where that transmission breaks down when the structures meant to protect it are not in place.

I. The Founding — Kopan and the Western Students

The FPMT's origin is inseparable from the geography of Tibetan exile. After the Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1959, Tibetan monastic institutions were destroyed or dispersed. Lama Thubten Yeshe — born in 1935 in the Tölung Valley near Lhasa, educated at Sera Je Monastic University — left Tibet at twenty-three and rebuilt his studies in the exile community at Buxa Duar, West Bengal. It was there he met Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche, born in 1945 in the Solu Khumbu region of Nepal and recognized as the reincarnation of the Lawudo Lama Kunzang Yeshe — a hermit whose cave above Namche Bazaar had been a center of solitary practice.

The two teachers eventually settled in Nepal, where Westerners were arriving in increasing numbers in the mid-1960s — backpackers, searchers, veterans of the counterculture looking for something the Western spiritual traditions had not provided. The encounter with Zina Rachevsky in 1965 was the catalytic event. She studied with Lama Yeshe and Lama Zopa intensively, eventually taking novice ordination as a nun before her death in 1973. Her connection drew others.

In 1969, Lama Yeshe and Lama Zopa established the Nepal Mahayana Gompa Centre — later Kopan Monastery — on a hillside east of Boudhanath stupa in the Kathmandu Valley. From 1971, Kopan began hosting the annual One-Month Course: a systematic introduction to Tibetan Buddhist philosophy and meditation, open to Westerners with no prerequisites. The courses drew hundreds of students from Australia, Europe, and North America, creating an organizational nucleus of deeply committed practitioners. Graduates returned to their home countries carrying the teaching and founding local centers. The Foundation for the Preservation of the Mahayana Tradition was formally incorporated in 1975 to coordinate the growing network.

The name encodes the institutional ambition. "Preservation" suggests transmission — carrying something across distance, whether cultural or temporal. "Mahayana" names the broad Buddhist tradition that includes the Vajrayana practices of Tibetan Buddhism. The FPMT's organizing principle was explicitly pedagogical: its purpose was not to build a community around a charismatic teacher but to transmit a complete educational curriculum to practitioners in the West, producing not just devotees but people with genuine training.

II. Lama Yeshe — The Teacher Who Met the West

Lama Thubten Yeshe was, by any account, an unusual monk. He had the complete classical Gelugpa formation — years of intensive debate, philosophy, and tantric study at Sera Je — and he applied it to a situation no Sera Je training had anticipated: rooms full of Westerners who had read Alan Watts but never heard of Tsongkhapa, who were fluent in the vocabulary of Jungian psychology but had no familiarity with the Tibetan medical model of mind.

His response was not to simplify the tradition or to meet Western seekers at the level of their existing categories. It was something more interesting: to translate the concepts horizontally, showing Westerners how Tibetan Buddhist ideas mapped onto questions they already cared about. He called tantra "inner science." He described the generation stage of deity yoga as a method for restructuring the practitioner's self-image at a depth that ordinary cognitive intervention could not reach. He placed the Tibetan understanding of consciousness in conversation with Western psychology explicitly, treating the encounter as productive rather than threatening. His book Introduction to Tantra and his lectures on Mahamudra — accessible, psychologically precise, occasionally funny — drew practitioners who had tried other teachers and found them either too esoteric or too accommodating.

He was also, by his students' accounts, simply present in a way that defied description. Robert Beer, Patrick Gaffney, and others who knew him in the 1970s describe the same quality that appears in accounts of other great Tibetan teachers: an attention that arrived completely, without the self-protective filtering that ordinarily mediates human contact. He did not perform accessibility. He simply was accessible, because the barriers that usually make one person opaque to another were, in him, unusually thin.

He died on March 3, 1984, in Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, at the age of forty-nine, of a congenital heart condition that had troubled him for years. He had been diagnosed with heart disease and had continued teaching and traveling despite the medical risk, a fact his students found moving and his doctors found alarming. He died, in the traditional Tibetan account, in the meditation posture of clear light, a sign of attainment in the Vajrayana understanding.

His death was an organizational crisis. The FPMT had been built around his presence and authority. Without him, the question was not whether the network would survive but who would lead it — and whether the tradition's own mechanism for answering that question could be applied to a founder who had lived and died in the West.

III. Tenzin Ösel Hita — The Reincarnation Experiment

The Tibetan Buddhist tradition holds that highly realized practitioners are reborn with continuity of awareness, and that their reincarnations — tulkus — can be identified through specific signs, tests, and the confirmation of other realized teachers. The Dalai Lama, the Karmapa, and hundreds of other Tibetan lineage-holders are tulkus recognized through this process. When Lama Yeshe died, the FPMT's teachers and students looked, in the traditional way, for signs of his return.

The signs pointed to Spain. In February 1985, María Torres and Francisco Hita — both FPMT practitioners based in Granada — had a son. At one year old, the child was recognized by the 14th Dalai Lama as the unmistaken reincarnation of Lama Yeshe. In March 1987, the child — named Tenzin Ösel Hita in the Tibetan naming — was formally enthroned at Tushita Retreat Centre in Dharamsala, in a ceremony attended by hundreds of FPMT students from around the world.

What followed was an experiment whose outcome neither the FPMT nor the Tibetan tradition had a template for. From 1991, when he was six years old, Ösel studied at Sera Je Monastic University in Karnataka, South India — the same institution Lama Yeshe had attended in Tibet. He was a Spanish child from a secular European family, placed into a Tibetan monastic institution in southern India, studying Tibetan language and Buddhist philosophy through methods evolved over centuries for Tibetan boys who had grown up in that culture from birth. The mismatch between the container and its inhabitant was structural, not personal.

He left monastic life in his mid-teens. He attended a private school in Victoria, British Columbia, graduated from the University of Madrid with a degree in filmmaking in 2008, and has worked since as a filmmaker and public speaker using the name Tenzin Ösel Hita. He retained his recognition as a tulku and his formal connection to the FPMT network while increasingly positioning himself as an independent voice within — and sometimes in tension with — the institution that had recognized and trained him.

In March 2025, Ösel issued a detailed public statement characterizing his relationship with the FPMT board as "toxic and controlling." He alleged that the board had made accusations against him without investigation and described the institutional culture as one of manipulation and insufficient ethical accountability. The FPMT board issued its own statement responding to these concerns. The situation remained unresolved as of early 2026.

The arc is significant beyond its particulars. The FPMT was the first major Tibetan Buddhist organization to take the tulku recognition process fully across cultural distance, applying it to a child born in Granada rather than in Tibet or Nepal. The attempt was an act of genuine faith in the universality of the Dharma — the conviction that realization is not ethnically determined, that consciousness continues across cultural difference as readily as across lifetimes. What the FPMT could not fully anticipate was the ethical complexity of placing a Western child in a traditional monastic formation without the surrounding web of cultural context, extended family, and community expectation that gives that formation its meaning in Tibetan society. The failure is instructive not because it reflects bad intentions but because it reveals the limits of what institutional good intentions can accomplish without structural wisdom.

IV. Lama Zopa Rinpoche — Forty Years of Stewardship

After Lama Yeshe's death, Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche became the FPMT's Spiritual Director — a role he held without interruption for thirty-nine years, until his death on April 13, 2023.

Lama Zopa's presence in the FPMT's organizational life was total. He traveled continuously, visiting centers around the world for teachings and empowerments, responding personally to students' correspondence in volumes that staggered his staff, and guiding the network through every major organizational decision. His teaching style was quite different from Lama Yeshe's: where Yeshe was accessible and psychologically fluent, Zopa was dense, associative, and marathon-length — teachings that ran four or six or eight hours were not unusual, and students who came expecting a conventional dharma talk sometimes found themselves in something closer to an endurance practice. His generosity was without apparent limit.

Under his leadership, the FPMT grew from a small network of centers in the late 1970s to its current scale. He oversaw the founding of Kopan's long-term program structure, the establishment of the Masters Program (since 1998, a seven-year curriculum adapted from traditional Geshe training), and the creation of the Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive — the FPMT's free-distribution teaching repository — in 1996. He guided the network through the Dagri Rinpoche accountability crisis in 2019–2020, a test the organization passed incompletely.

He died in Kathmandu at the age of seventy-six, after being evacuated by helicopter from altitude sickness in the Tsum Valley of Nepal, where he had been leading a pilgrimage. His death, like Lama Yeshe's, was described by students who were present as occurring in meditative equipoise. His reincarnation has been confirmed as having been born in Nepal by the Dalai Lama, though the child has not yet been formally identified.

The FPMT board announced that no single Spiritual Director would succeed Lama Zopa. Collective governance — the board and a Council of center directors — would assume the institutional responsibilities previously held by one person. The organization entered its post-founder period without the succession crisis that had destabilized other Western Buddhist organizations, partly because Lama Zopa himself had spent years building the institutional infrastructure that did not depend on his physical presence.

V. Structure, Education, and the Free-Distribution Model

The FPMT is organized as a network of independent centers, each separately incorporated and locally financed, coordinated by an international headquarters in Portland, Oregon. Each affiliated center follows a three-level program structure: the General Program (introductory meditation and Buddhist philosophy, open to the public), the Foundation Program (systematic study of five traditional texts over several years), and the Teacher Training Program (multi-year curriculum qualifying practitioners to teach in FPMT centers).

The organization's most significant educational innovation is the Masters Program — a seven-year intensive curriculum adapted from the Tibetan Geshe program that is the pinnacle of traditional Gelugpa education. The Masters Program is hosted primarily at Istituto Lama Tzong Khapa (Pomaia, Tuscany, Italy, founded 1976, one of the oldest FPMT centers and a site of five Dalai Lama visits) and Nalanda Monastery (near Lavaur in the Toulouse region of France). The first completion was in 2004. The program has produced practitioners who are, in a meaningful sense, the first Western-trained Buddhist scholars in the Gelugpa tradition — not Western academics studying Tibetan Buddhism from the outside, but Western practitioners who have undergone the traditional curriculum from the inside. Several have taken geshe degrees, a milestone in the history of the Dharma's westward movement.

The Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive (LYWA), founded in 1996, contains over 24,000 pages of transcribed teachings by Lama Yeshe and Lama Zopa Rinpoche, audio recordings, and video. LYWA operates on a free-distribution model: booklets, PDFs, and audio are provided without charge through its website. In 2025, LYWA extended its free distribution to all FPMT centers globally, providing physical copies of its publications for distribution to visitors. The archive is one of the largest repositories of freely available Tibetan Buddhist teaching in English. It is, however, a free-distribution program, not an open-license one: copyright is retained by LYWA and FPMT, and reproduction is not permitted. None of its content is archivable in the public-domain sense.

Wisdom Publications, FPMT-affiliated and based in Somerville, Massachusetts, is one of the leading academic Buddhist publishers in the English-speaking world. Founded 1975, it publishes scholarly and practice-oriented Buddhist texts — including Lama Yeshe's and Lama Zopa's books — alongside major academic translations and studies. It is a commercial publisher; its content is commercially copyrighted.

The FPMT's largest institutional presence remains Kopan Monastery in Kathmandu, which continues to host the annual meditation courses that began in 1971. Other significant centers include Tushita Meditation Centre (above McLeod Ganj, Dharamsala — the Dalai Lama's town and an FPMT center since 1972), Land of Medicine Buddha (Soquel, California), and Jamyang Buddhist Centre (London).

VI. Controversies — Accountability and Its Limits

The FPMT's record on institutional accountability is uneven, and honesty requires holding both the successes and the failures.

The Dagri Rinpoche case (2019–2020) is the most fully documented. Dagri Rinpoche was a senior Gelugpa lama and longtime FPMT teacher — a figure with decades of authority in the network. In May 2019, he was arrested in India for groping a woman on a domestic flight. The subsequent investigation by the FaithTrust Institute, commissioned by the FPMT itself, confirmed sexual misconduct against multiple students over a period of ten years. Dagri Rinpoche was permanently removed from the FPMT teacher roster.

The FaithTrust report, however, did not simply exonerate the institution. It criticized the FPMT for lacking any clear complaint mechanism through which students could report misconduct, and found that statements made by Lama Zopa Rinpoche during the investigation — characterizing Dagri Rinpoche's accusers in terms that questioned their motivations — had undermined the process. The institution had commissioned an external investigation and acted on its findings, which is more than some Western Buddhist organizations have done. It had also, by lacking any complaint infrastructure, allowed a decade of misconduct to continue unaddressed. Both things are true.

The Osel Hita 2025 statement represents a different category of accountability challenge — less a specific misconduct allegation than a critique of institutional culture. Ösel's claim that the FPMT board is "toxic and controlling," and his description of feeling accused without investigation, suggests a governance culture that has not resolved the tensions between the traditional authority structure of a teacher-centered tradition and the expectations of transparency and due process that Western practitioners — especially Western practitioners who are themselves tulkus with formal institutional standing — bring to their relationship with the institution.

No external investigation has been commissioned in response to Ösel's 2025 statement. The FPMT board has responded, but the substance of Ösel's concerns remains unaddressed in public documentation.

Together, these cases describe an institution that has shown genuine willingness to act on documented misconduct when compelled — but that has not yet built the proactive accountability infrastructure that would allow it to identify and address problems before they require outside intervention or public crisis.

VII. FPMT and NKT — Two Paths from the Same Source

Understanding the FPMT requires understanding what it is not. The New Kadampa Tradition (NKT-IKBU) and the FPMT are the two largest Gelugpa Tibetan Buddhist organizations in the Western world. Both were founded in the 1970s. Both draw on the same lineage — the Gelugpa school of Je Tsongkhapa, transmitted through Sera Je Monastic University. They are, in almost every organizational respect, opposites.

The NKT is a "pure school" organization: students study only the books of Geshe Kelsang Gyatso, attend only NKT centers, and do not mix Buddhist systems. External teachers are not invited. The tradition is self-contained, drawing a clear institutional boundary between itself and the rest of Tibetan Buddhism.

The FPMT is explicitly ecumenical. It invites teachers from multiple lineages and traditions. Its curriculum engages the broad Gelugpa textual canon, not a single teacher's synthesis. Its students are encouraged to seek teachings wherever they can find them. The organization's relationship with the Dalai Lama — who has visited FPMT centers, given teachings in FPMT institutions, and confirmed the recognition of the FPMT's tulkus — is a direct expression of this ecumenical orientation.

The contrast is a genuine fork in the road of how Tibetan Buddhism transplants to Western soil: one path emphasizes institutional clarity, bounded identity, and a single authoritative voice; the other emphasizes breadth, openness to multiple transmissions, and integration with the broader Tibetan Buddhist world. Neither approach has resolved the accountability challenges that Western Buddhist organizations face; both have produced genuine transmission and documented institutional failure. The archive documents both because both are real expressions of the same Aquarian impulse — the attempt to bring a pre-modern wisdom tradition into the modern world without losing what made it worth bringing.

VIII. Aquarian Significance

The FPMT's significance in the broader Aquarian phenomenon operates on several levels.

Institutional durability: Fifty years of continuous operation, 138 centers in 34 countries — one of the longest-standing and geographically widest Tibetan Buddhist institutions in the West. The organization's survival of two major teacher deaths without organizational collapse is, in itself, a significant datum about what Western Buddhist institutions are now capable of.

Educational innovation: The One-Month Course at Kopan pioneered accessible Dharma education for Westerners in an intensive retreat format that became the template for Western Buddhist retreat teaching globally. The Masters Program is a genuine contribution to the Dharma's transmission across cultural distance — adapting a centuries-old monastic curriculum for practitioners who cannot devote their lives to a monastery, and producing trained Buddhist scholars who are Western by formation.

The tulku experiment: Tenzin Ösel Hita is the most fully documented attempt to apply the traditional Tibetan tulku recognition and training system to a child from outside the Tibetan cultural context. The experiment's partial failure is as instructive as its ambition: it demonstrates that the universality of realization does not automatically translate into the cultural portability of the institutional forms that have traditionally supported its transmission.

The free-distribution model: LYWA's 24,000+ pages of freely accessible teaching represent one of the largest repositories of publicly available Tibetan Buddhist instruction in English. In a tradition where much teaching has been restricted to initiates or available only for significant fees, this represents a genuine democratization.

The accountability question: The Dagri Rinpoche case and the Ösel Hita 2025 statement both point to the same structural gap: an organization whose founding impulse was pedagogical generosity but whose institutional mechanisms for accountability have consistently lagged behind its scale. This is not unique to the FPMT. It is the characteristic failure mode of Western Buddhist organizations that grew rapidly around charismatic authority without simultaneously building the structural accountability that would protect students and practitioners when that authority is abused or goes wrong. The FPMT's arc is the archive's clearest illustration of both the aspiration and the gap.

Colophon

This ethnographic introduction to the Foundation for the Preservation of the Mahayana Tradition was researched and written for the Good Work Library as part of the Living Traditions series — a documentation project covering significant Aquarian communities in the global religious landscape since the nineteenth century. The FPMT has not published any canonical text in the public domain or under a Creative Commons license; no text is archived alongside this profile. The Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive (lamayeshe.com) offers free-access teachings in English.

Primary research for this profile was conducted in March 2026, drawing on official FPMT documentation, academic scholarship in Tibetan and Western Buddhism, and journalistic coverage of the organization's major controversies. The account of the Osel Hita 2025 public statement is based on sources available at dakinitranslations.com (March 24, 2025) and the FPMT board response at fpmt.org (March 11, 2025). Academic sources include David Kay, Tibetan and Zen Buddhism in Britain (Routledge, 2004); Ann Gleig, American Dharma: Buddhism Beyond Modernity (Yale University Press, 2019); and FaithTrust Institute investigation findings (Dagri Rinpoche, 2019–2020).

Compiled and formatted for the Good Work Library by the New Tianmu Anglican Church, 2026.

🌲