Sekai Mahikari Bunmei Kyōdan — A Living Tradition of East Asia

On June 23, 1974, Kōtama Okada — the man who had heard a divine voice on his fifty-eighth birthday, named himself the Jewel of Light, and built a Japanese new religion from that morning — died at age seventy-three. He left behind an organization of several hundred thousand initiated members, a scripture called the Goseigen containing fifty-two divine revelations, a practice of hand-raising purification that he had inherited from one tradition and reframed for another, and no unambiguous written will.

What he also left behind — though this was not visible until later — was one of the most instructive succession disputes in the Aquarian world: a contest between a biological daughter and an administrative officer, fought in courts and in congregations simultaneously, producing a Supreme Court victory for one side and a migration of followers to the other. The courts declared Sekiguchi Sakae the lawful Second Oshienushi of the registered religious corporation. The practitioners declared, with their feet, that the Okada daughter was the one they recognized as the heir. By 1978, both things were simultaneously true: Sekiguchi held the original name and the legal title; Keishu Okada held most of the members. They have been two Mahikaris ever since.

I. The Original Organization

To understand World Divine Light (Sekai Mahikari Bunmei Kyōdan, SMBK) is first to understand what it was before it became half of what it is. The organization traces its founding to February 27, 1959 — the morning of Yoshikazu Okada's fifty-eighth birthday — when he experienced what the tradition calls kamigakari (divine possession): fever, a voice, and a command. "Thy name shall be Kōtama. Raise thy hand. The world will encounter severe times." He had spent the previous decade in the Church of World Messianity, where johrei healing — transmission of divine light through the raised palm — had restored his health after tuberculosis of the spine. Now he was told to carry a new, intensified version of that same practice forward, under a new cosmic framework and a new divine name.

He founded a small organization initially called Yōkōshi Tomo no Kai (陽光子友乃会, "Sunshine Children Friends Association") in 1959, and on January 19, 1963, formally registered it as a religious corporation under the name Sekai Mahikari Bunmei Kyōdan — "World True Light Civilization Religious Organization." This is the legal entity that exists to the present day.

Over the next eleven years, Kōtama Okada built the tradition's core institutions: the Goseigen (御聖言), a scripture of fifty-two divine revelations received through automatic writing; the omitama, the sacred pendant issued to practitioners who complete initiation and that serves as a conduit for divine light; the three-day introductory training course after which practitioners are authorized to perform okiyome (spiritual purification through raised-hand transmission); and an organizational structure centered on local dojos under the leadership of center heads appointed by the central administration.

The practice Okada transmitted was the third generation of a coherent lineage: Ōmoto (1892, Deguchi Nao) had introduced the concept of divine healing power channeled through sacred objects; Sekai Kyūsei-kyō (1935, Okada Mokichi, no family relation) had simplified this into the direct raised-hand transmission of johrei; Mahikari further simplified and re-cosmologized it into tekazashi, framing the purification as a response to an urgent eschatological condition — the divine "baptism of fire" that would purify or destroy a spiritually polluted world. Each generation understood itself as receiving a more direct, more urgent version of the original divine teaching. The fuller history of this lineage is treated in the companion profile of Sukyō Mahikari.

By the time of Kōtama Okada's death in June 1974, the organization claimed hundreds of thousands of initiated members across Japan, with an established international presence. Winston Davis's anthropological fieldwork at Mahikari dojos in this period estimated somewhere between one hundred thousand and two hundred thousand nominal members, with fifty to seventy-five thousand active practitioners. The organization had the momentum of a movement in full expansion.

II. The Succession Dispute — Courts and Congregations

Sekiguchi Sakae (関口榮, 1909–1994) was, by any institutional measure, Kōtama Okada's most senior officer. A self-made businessman who had built the Mitsuya Group — taxi company, air transport, driving school, credit union, gas business — he had joined the nascent Mahikari organization in 1959 and risen over fifteen years to hold the most senior administrative positions: center chief, Guidance Department director, Sukyo Bureau director, and finally Chairman of the Committee for Construction of the Su-Za World Main Shrine. He was, in practical terms, the organization's number two.

His claim to succeed Okada rested on testimony: multiple witnesses attested that the founder had designated him as the Second Oshienushi (教え主, "master of the teaching") orally. He strengthened this claim on January 11, 1975, by reporting that he had received his divine name "Seiho" (聖鳳, Sacred Phoenix) through Tenjo — Shinto-style automatic writing — which he presented as divine confirmation of the succession.

Against him stood Sachiko Okada (born 1925), Kōtama Okada's adopted daughter, who took the religious name Keishu (恵珠). Her claim rested on a revelation document: a handwritten note allegedly produced by Okada on June 13, 1974, ten days before his death, titled something like "Crucial Revelation after long absence." The document, as reconstructed from court proceedings, contained language about awarding a divine authority to his daughter. Keishu could produce only photocopies; the original could not be presented. The courts found the handwriting authentically Okada's but the sentences grammatically confused and legally insufficient as a clear succession designation.

The litigation proceeded in three stages. The Tokyo District Court ruled on February 24, 1977, that Sekiguchi was the lawful Representative Director of SMBK under Article 6 of the organization's own governing charter — a ruling grounded in religious corporation law, not theological adjudication. The courts were not determining who the divine had chosen; they were determining who the registered corporation's legal rules designated. Sekiguchi's administrative seniority and the testimonial record were sufficient.

Keishu, having lost in the courts, moved organizationally. On June 23, 1978 — four years to the day after the founder's death — she registered a new religious corporation under the name Sukyō Mahikari (崇教真光), and over the following years the settlement of July 10, 1982, formalized the separation: Keishu personally acknowledged in court that Sekiguchi was the lawful Second Oshienushi of SMBK; both parties agreed to mutual non-interference. Two legally distinct organizations now occupied the same theological universe, claiming the same founder, using the same scripture, and teaching the same practice.

The division of membership tells the essential story. Approximately eighty-five percent of the original practitioners followed Keishu to Sukyō Mahikari; approximately fifteen percent remained with Sekiguchi and SMBK. The reasons are not difficult to identify. Keishu held actual possession of most physical dojo infrastructure at the time of the founder's death. Her connection to Okada through filial relationship — adopted daughter, heir by blood-substitute — carried the authority that practitioners of a charismatic movement understand as legitimate succession. Sekiguchi's legal victory was real; his institutional inheritance was a fraction of the whole. Some accounts suggest Sukyō Mahikari obscured the nature of the split from members who transferred — describing what had occurred in vague terms of a "renegade faction" and airbrushing Sekiguchi from photographs and organizational histories — which would explain why many members who moved to Sukyō Mahikari did so without clearly understanding they were joining a new and legally distinct organization.

III. The Two World Shrines

The theological paradox that most clearly marks the split is the existence of two competing World Shrines.

Kōtama Okada had made the construction of a Su-Za (スーザ, "God's Throne") — a World Main Shrine from which divine light would irradiate the entire planet — a central eschatological priority of the movement. Both successor organizations inherited this mandate and each executed it separately.

Sukyō Mahikari completed its World Shrine (the "Suza") in Takayama City, Gifu Prefecture, and dedicated it on November 3, 1984. The Takayama Suza is elaborate, architecturally prominent, and functions as a major pilgrimage site for Sukyō Mahikari's global community.

SMBK completed its own Su-Za World Main Shrine (主座世界総本山) three years later, on August 23, 1987, in the mountainous interior of the Izu Peninsula — specifically at Hiekawa, Izu City, Shizuoka Prefecture, on the slopes of Mount Amagi. The site was selected according to three divine requirements that the founder had specified: visibility of Mount Fuji, presence of hot springs, and stands of Japanese cypress trees. The shrine complex occupies approximately 490 acres of mountain landscape and serves as SMBK's organizational headquarters.

Both shrines exist. Both organizations claim theirs is the World Shrine designated by divine command. Within the theological framework shared by both organizations — that the Su-God is the Supreme God, that the World Shrine is a unique sacred center, and that its construction fulfills a specific divine mandate — both claims cannot simultaneously be correct. Neither organization has publicly addressed this contradiction. The two shrines face each other across roughly 300 kilometers of Japanese landscape, each claiming to be the world's divine center.

IV. Theology and Practice

SMBK and Sukyō Mahikari share a theology that is, in its essentials, identical. Both use the Goseigen as primary scripture — the collection of fifty-two divine revelations received by Kōtama Okada, first published in English in 1982 under SMBK's auspices, now in use by both organizations. The core cosmological claims are held in common: Su-no-Kami (ス神), the Supreme Creator; the origin of humanity on the lost continent of Mu, with Japan as its spiritual center; the divine genealogy of the Japanese imperial line; the role of reiso (spirit disturbance from troubled ancestors and animal spirits) as the underlying cause of human suffering; and the urgent eschatological situation in which purification through divine light is the civilizational necessity. The theology's more troubling elements — the framing of the Holocaust as divine punishment of the Jewish people; the hierarchy of Five Colored Races; the teaching that Jesus, Moses, and the Buddha all traveled to Japan to receive original wisdom — are shared by both organizations as contents of the same founding scripture.

Practice in SMBK dojos follows the same basic pattern as Sukyō Mahikari: three-day introductory training (kenshū) upon joining; receipt of the omitama pendant; acquisition of the skill of okiyome (the hand-raising purification practice, called tekazashi in Sukyō Mahikari); regular sessions at the local dojo; Monthly Ceremonies gathering the community; pilgrimage to the World Shrine. The companion prayer book — the Norigotoshū (祝詞集), corresponding to Sukyō Mahikari's Yōkōshi Prayer Book — guides daily and ceremonial use.

One doctrinal nuance distinguishes the two organizations, though it is a difference of emphasis rather than substance. SMBK has historically placed greater weight on the idea that the current Oshienushi receives ongoing divine revelations — monthly communications from the Su-God channeled through the holy master — rather than foregrounding the already-completed body of the founder's teachings. Sukyō Mahikari similarly maintains that its current leader receives divine guidance, but the Goseigen as completed scripture holds a more prominent position in Sukyō Mahikari's public identity. This difference of emphasis corresponds to no visible difference in practice.

As with Sukyō Mahikari, the texts of the Goseigen and the Norigotoshū are under institutional copyright and not freely available. No public-domain or Creative Commons SMBK text has been identified.

V. Leadership and Current Status

Sekiguchi Sakae led SMBK as Second Oshienushi from 1974 until his death on January 3, 1994. On January 3, 1994 — the very day of his father's death — Katsutoshi Sekiguchi (関口勝利, born September 1, 1939) became the Third Oshienushi, his succession announced through divine revelation. Katsutoshi Sekiguchi holds an economics degree from Keio University (1962) and pursued additional study at San Francisco State University (1965). As of available sources, he continues to lead the organization.

The dynastic character of this succession — from Sekiguchi Sakae to his son Katsutoshi — carries a historical irony that the organization has not publicly addressed. Sekiguchi Sakae's legal claim against Keishu Okada rested partly on the argument that filial relationship to the founder was not a theologically valid basis for succession. His own successor is his biological son, legitimized, as Keishu's claim was, by revelation. Both Mahikari lineages have arrived at the same answer to the succession problem: the next holy master is found in the family of the previous one, ratified by divine communication.

SMBK operates approximately 180 spiritual volunteer (SV) centers across Japan's forty-seven prefectures, with concentration in major urban regions. International presence is confirmed in: the United States (centers in Houston, Los Angeles, Santa Ana, New York, Chicago, and Honolulu; the US entity — Sekai Mahikari Bunmei Kyodan U.S.A., EIN 23-7447917 — is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit with approximately 7.4 million in total assets as of 2024); Canada (Vancouver); Taiwan (13+ centers); France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom; the Philippines, Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand, and Australia; Brazil, Mexico, and Uruguay; and centers in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Angola. The most recent reliable membership estimate, from approximately 2007, places global membership at fifty to one hundred thousand practitioners — considerably smaller than Sukyō Mahikari's claimed one million.

VI. Honest Assessment

Any honest account of SMBK must begin where any honest account of Sukyō Mahikari must begin: with the Goseigen. Because both organizations share the same founding scripture, the troubling elements documented in the Sukyō Mahikari profile — the anti-Semitic theology of the Holocaust, the racial hierarchy of the Five Colored Races, the Japan-centered civilization mythology drawn from James Churchward's invented continent of Mu — are present in SMBK in identical form. Former member testimonies report the same financial pressure: the implication that persistent illness or misfortune indicates spiritual impurity requiring larger offerings, and that resistance to giving is itself evidence of that impurity. European authorities have included Mahikari organizations on government cult monitoring lists; SMBK's smaller European presence has attracted less specific regulatory attention than Sukyō Mahikari, but no principled theological distinction separates them on these questions.

What distinguishes SMBK from Sukyō Mahikari is, in the end, more historical than theological. SMBK is the organization that won the courts and lost the congregation — that prevailed in every legal forum and was abandoned by the majority it served. This history has produced a smaller, quieter, less internationally visible organization that has spent fifty years in the shadow of the institutional colossus that its own legal victory helped create by forcing the formation of a separate entity. The Sukyō Mahikari profile describes a movement claiming one million practitioners; this profile describes a movement claiming fifty to one hundred thousand. Both organizations teach the same things. The difference is that SMBK, in losing most of its practitioners, has also largely lost its scholarly attention, its journalistic coverage, and its place in the public record of Japanese new religions.

The scholar Kuniko Miyanaga, whose 1983 doctoral dissertation at the University of British Columbia remains the only monograph-length academic study of SMBK as its own subject, observed that SMBK occupies an unusual sociological position: it is the original organization, the legal heir, the institutional continuation of what Kōtama Okada founded — and yet it is, in every measure of membership and visibility, the minority. The Goseigen copyright was SMBK's; the first English edition (1982) was SMBK's publication. The tradition's largest shrine took three years longer to complete than its competitor's. The World Shrine at Amagi is real, and consecrated, and magnificent, and largely unknown outside the community it serves. The little light illuminates the same territory as the larger one. It is simply less often seen.

Colophon

Profile written by Barco (from the Portuguese: boat), Life 17 of the Living Traditions Researcher, March 21, 2026.

Research sources: Wikipedia, World Divine Light; Wikipedia, Mahikari movement; Wikipedia, Yoshikazu Okada; worlddivinelight.org (official English site); mahikari.or.jp (Japanese official site, SV Centers and History pages); Kuniko Miyanaga, "Social Reproduction and Transcendence: An Analysis of the Sekai Mahikari Bunmei Kyōdan" (PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, 1983); Winston Davis, Dojo: Magic and Exorcism in Modern Japan (Stanford University Press, 1980); Anne Broder, "Mahikari in Context" (Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 35/2, 2008); WRSP, Sukyo Mahikari; Tenmei (Life 9), Sukyō Mahikari profile (this archive, 2026); ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer (Sekai Mahikari Bunmei Kyodan U.S.A., EIN 23-7447917); Seeing Red (seeingred.cyou, World Shrines comparison); en-academic.com (Mahikari); HandWiki (Mahikari, Yoshikazu Okada).

No public-domain or freely licensed SMBK scripture identified. The Goseigen was first published in English by SMBK (1982 copyright). Both SMBK and Sukyō Mahikari use the same text; neither edition is archivable.

🌲