In early Buddhist thought, the desire for liberation presents a puzzle: if craving is the root of suffering, how can the aspiration to be free of craving itself be wholesome? Writing from the University of Houston in February 1991, Bandula Jayatilaka addresses this question by mapping the Buddhist typology of motivation — distinguishing ego-desire from Chandha, the productive wanting that drives wholesome action. His account of the graduated path, from generosity through the seven enlightenment factors to the final equanimity that releases even the aspiration itself, offers a practitioner's guide to the inner architecture of liberation. He closes with characteristic Buddhist humility: technical knowledge of these states does not imply having attained them.
A practitioner raised the following question on soc.religion.eastern:
How can one desire to be enlightened? Presumably desire is one of the things that hinders us in reaching enlightenment. If I want to be enlightened, isn't that an ego-desire? If so, I will never become enlightened, because my ego will get in the way. So how can I desire to be enlightened without involving my ego? Is there some other part of me that does the desiring, and my ego must step aside?
The term desire is loosely used, so we tend to apply the same word to everything. But if we look at this problem through the lens of motivation, the confusion may resolve. Consider Maslow's hierarchy of needs: it shows the variety of human needs and hence the variety of motivations behind them.
The motivation to kill a person for wealth is an ego-desire. On the other hand, helping a wounded or dying person cannot be categorized as an ego-desire. In the former case, there is greed, anger, and craving, followed by acts of killing and lying. In the latter, the qualities present are compassion, patience, detachment, and wisdom.
Similarly, consider two actions of the mind: fantasizing and meditation for mental development. In the first, lustful thoughts, ignorance, and greed are present — it is driven by ego-desire. In the latter, the effort is to remove defilements from the mind; the wanting present is a wanting to have the positive qualities of mind. There is a subtle point here: even this wanting becomes an ego-desire if one meditates out of arrogance, to look down upon others who do not practice. The quality of the motivation is what distinguishes them, not the surface form.
By examining these examples we can see that all "desires" are not ego-desires. Some we pursue to fatten the ego — for greed, lust, or pride. Others arise from a different need: an altruistic motive, an orientation toward detachment from the ego, a wish to help others.
The Buddhist Typology of Aspiration
People generally begin seeking enlightenment by reflecting upon the unsatisfactoriness of life — what the Pali tradition calls dukkha. This reflection is not born of arrogance or of ego-desires such as greed and lust. Indeed, arrogance would become a hindrance in the search: one motivated by the wish to look down upon others would not be seeking true enlightenment, and such an effort would not succeed.
The Buddhist tradition names specific wholesome qualities of mind from which genuine seeking arises:
Chandha (Pali: छन्द) is the wanting to do the profitable — the orientation toward wholesome action. This is not the craving that binds us but the productive aspiration that moves us toward the path.
Shraddha (Sanskrit: श्रद्धा; Pali: Saddhā) is often translated as "faith," but this rendering is insufficient and can misrepresent the quality. It is more accurately described as the likeness toward positive qualities of mind — a felt resonance with what is good and true, grounded in direct experience rather than belief.
Karuna (Pali/Sanskrit: करुण) is compassion — the wish that beings be free from suffering. This motivates practice not as a private project of self-improvement but as part of a shared movement toward liberation.
The Enlightenment Factors
As practice deepens, the Buddha taught a specific set of mental qualities whose development is essential for the realization of enlightenment. These include:
Analysis of phenomena (Dhamma-vicaya) — the direct investigation of experience as it arises.
Mindfulness (Sati) — the clear, present awareness of body, feeling, mind, and phenomena.
Concentration (Samādhi) — the unification and stillness of mind that allows deep seeing.
And arising last of all, as the factors mature: equanimity (Upekkhā).
At this subtle stage, equanimity balances the mind by releasing both eagerness and unhappiness — settling it into the precise poise from which enlightenment can be realized. And at this level, even the desire for enlightenment itself must be let go. The aspiration that propelled the practitioner this far becomes, in the final approach, one more thing to release.
This is the graduated nature of the Buddhist path. The subtle final stages should not be confused with the essential qualities required at the beginning of the search — chandha, shraddha, karuna, and the rest. Those are necessary. They carry us across most of the distance. Only at the very end does the hand that held the lamp also need to be opened.
Colophon
Posted by Bandula Jayatilaka (University of Houston) to soc.religion.eastern, Usenet, February 1991, in response to a question by Hugh Garsden (University of Adelaide) on the paradox of desiring liberation. Jayatilaka closes his post: "My mention of the subtle technicalities of enlightenment are brought out here for the benefit of Buddhists and not meant to imply that I have attained enlightenment." Archived from the UTZOO Usenet archive (batch b202) by Kenshō, March 2026.
🌲