by Gnyan Dpal dbyangs
This terse instruction turns apparent phenomena back toward mind, then
refuses to make mind into a new object of meditation. “Unborn” is medicine
against grasping at things as real, not another position to inhabit. There
is no second mind with which to correct the first, and even signlessness
must not become a place to dwell.The work is D4448 / Toh 4448 in the Degé Tengyur, volume 211, folios
384a.7–384b.6. It is also known as The Little Grain of the View (Lta ba
rgum chung), and is one of the Six Lamps associated with the early Tibetan
master Gnyan Dpal dbyangs (conventionally Nyen Palyang). Scholarship
places these short lamps in the formative or proto–Great Perfection
literature. The 84000 placeholder calls the work The Lamp Clearing Away
the Darkness of Extreme [Views] and renders the author’s name as
Śrīghoṣa, but contains no translation body. This independent translation
was made from the pinned Esukhia Degé etext and checked against canonical
comparison witnesses and a published critical Tibetan text. No translator
is named; the colophon presents the work as a Tibetan composition.
Phenomena are the mind’s delusion;
apart from mind, no phenomena exist.
What appears as phenomena is deluded mind;
dependent arising, an illusion, is unborn.
Even the teaching “There is no arising”
serves to reverse grasping at things as real.
Since illusion is primordially unborn,
do not apply even the conventional term “unborn.”1
“This space does not exist”—
what fool would form such a thought?
The wise never grasp it as existent from the outset;
they neither think it nonexistent nor utter such words.
Because there are no phenomena apart from mind,
the nature of phenomena to be meditated upon is not elsewhere.
If mind too has been unborn from the beginning,
where could a meditator exist?
If mind itself, the root of expression,
is unborn and has no real foundation,
which conventions—“meditation” or “nonmeditation”—
could apply, and to what?
No being possesses two mindstreams.2
This mind is unborn and cannot be perceived in itself.
Since no mind exists apart from it,
what could be altered and made to remain?
As long as deluded thought meets its conditions,
mind appears like a mirage.
Knowing its nature, there is nothing to correct;
not knowing it is like trying to correct a mirage.
Nonconceptual, signless minds have not realized it;
do not make mind dwell even in signlessness.3
If it does not dwell in signlessness,
why even speak of dwelling in signs?
There is nothing to accomplish and nowhere to abide.
What is free of fabrication is like space,
entirely unstained by all the faults
of meditative absorption born of fabrication.
If one asks, “How could profound nonconceptuality
appear as an object of the intellect?”
An experience of profound nonconceptuality,
precisely because it is an experience, is not that itself.
Colophon
The Little Grain of the View. The Lamp That Dispels the Darkness of
Extremes. Composed by the Tibetan paṇḍita and ācārya Gnyan Dpal dbyangs.
Good Works Translation from Tibetan (Degé Tengyur D4448 / Toh 4448, volume
211, folios 384a.7–384b.6). Independently translated from the Tibetan source
for the Good Works Library, July 2026. No translator is named.
Compiled and formatted for the Good Works Library, 2026.
🌲
Source Text: མཐའི་མུན་སེལ་སྒྲོན་མ།
Tibetan source text from the Esukhia digital edition of the Degé Tengyur,
D4448, folios 384a.7–384b.6. Presented complete for reference and
verification; the D-number, opening and closing title forms, folio markers,
spelling, and line divisions are retained.
{D4448}༄། །མཐའི་མུན་སེལ་
[384b]
[384b.1]སྒྲོན་མ་བཞུགས། ༄༅༅། །།ཆོས་རྣམས་སེམས་ཀྱི་འཁྲུལ་པ་སྟེ། །སེམས་ལས་མ་གཏོགས་ཆོས་རྣམས་མེད། །ཆོས་སུ་སྣང་བ་འཁྲུལ་པའི་སེམས། །རྟེན་འབྲེལ་སྒྱུ་མ་སྐྱེ་བ་མེད། །སྐྱེ་བ་མེད་ཅེས་བསྟན་པའང་། །དངོས་པོར་འཛིན་པ་བཟློག་ཕྱིར་ཏེ། །སྒྱུ་མ་ཡེ་ནས་སྐྱེ་མེད་ལ། །
[384b.2]སྐྱེ་མེད་སྙད་ཀྱི་སྒྲ་མི་གདགས། །ནམ་མཁའ་འདི་ནི་མེད་དོ་ཞེས། །བླུན་པོ་གང་ཞིག་རྟོག་པར་བྱེད། །མཁས་པ་སྔོན་ནས་ཡོད་མི་འཛིན། །མེད་པར་མི་རྟོག་ཚིག་མི་བརྗོད། །སེམས་ལས་མ་གཏོགས་ཆོས་མེད་ཕྱིར། །བསྒོམ་བྱའི་ཆོས་ཉིད་གུད་ན་མེད། །སེམས་ཀྱང་ཡེ་ནས་མ་སྐྱེས་ན། །
[384b.3]བསྒོམ་པ་པོའང་གང་ལ་ཡོད། །བརྗོད་པའི་རྩ་བ་སེམས་ཉིད་ནི། །མ་སྐྱེས་དངོས་གཞི་ཡོད་མིན་ན། །བསྒོམ་དང་བསྒོམ་དུ་མེད་པ་ཡི། །ཐ་སྙད་གང་ཞིག་གང་ལ་འཇུག །འགྲོ་ལ་སེམས་རྒྱུད་གཉིས་མི་འཆང་། །དེ་ནི་མ་སྐྱེས་རང་མི་དམིགས། །དེ་ལས་གཞན་པའི་སེམས་མེད་ཕྱིར། །
[384b.4]བཅོས་ཤིང་གནས་པ་གང་ཞིག་ཡོད། །འཁྲུལ་རྟོག་རྐྱེན་དང་ལྡན་གྱི་བར། །སྨིག་རྒྱུ་བཞིན་དུ་སེམས་སྣང་ན། །རང་བཞིན་ཤེས་པས་བཅོས་སུ་མེད། །མི་ཤེས་སྨིག་རྒྱུ་བཅོས་པ་བཞིན། །མི་རྟོག་མཚན་མེད་སེམས་རྣམས་ཀྱིས། །མ་རྟོགས་མཚན་མ་མེད་ལའང་གནས་མ་བྱེད། །
[384b.5]མཚན་མ་མེད་ལ་མི་གནས་ན། །མཚན་མར་གནས་པ་སྨོས་ཅི་དགོས། །བསྒྲུབ་པ་མེད་ཅིང་གནས་པ་མེད། །འདུ་བྱེད་མེད་པ་མཁའ་འདྲ་བས། །འདུ་བྱེད་ལས་བྱུང་བསམ་གཏན་སྐྱོན། །མ་ལུས་ཀུན་གྱིས་གོས་པ་མེད། །ཇི་ལྟར་རྟོག་མེད་ཟབ་མོ་ཞིག །བློ་ཡི་ཡུལ་དུ་སྣང་ཞེ་ན། །མི་
[384b.6]རྟོག་ཟབ་མོའི་ཉམས་མྱོང་བ། །མྱོང་བ་ཡིན་ཕྱིར་དེ་ཉིད་མིན། །ལྟ་བ་དགུམ་ཆུང་། མཐའི་མུན་སེལ་སྒྲོན་མ། བོད་ཀྱི་པཎྜི་ཏ་ཨཱ་ཙརྱ་གཉན་དཔལ་དབྱངས་ཀྱིས་མཛད་པའོ།། །།
Source Colophon
The controlling source is the Esukhia digital edition of the Degé Tengyur,
pinned at commit 174653137d62af481f53c6ae3dc842bf8629323e. The exact D4448
extraction is 3,870 bytes with SHA-256
209f540abfce0eb6db855c543738c3bba621450933d1021c3512a313c30b91a6.
It begins on folio 384a.7, runs through the author statement on folio 384b.6,
and ends immediately before D4449. The Esukhia source is recorded as a
mechanical reproduction of a public-domain work.
The closing source prints Lta ba dgum chung. Samten G. Karmay’s critical
text gives the normalized Lta ba rgum chung, with dgum as a variant, and
identifies it as the work’s alternate title. The same identification appears
in Sam van Schaik’s account of Gnyan Dpal dbyangs’s Six Lamps. The translation
therefore renders it as The Little Grain of the View, not as a phrase about
“slaying” the view. The diplomatic Degé source block above remains
unaltered. See Samten G. Karmay, The Great Perfection (rDzogs
chen), 2nd ed. (Brill,
2007), pp. 66–67 and 80–83; and Sam van Schaik, “The Early Days of the Great
Perfection”,
pp. 190–92.
🌲
Footnotes
-
The text treats “unborn” as a conventional antidote to reification, then refuses to reify the antidote itself. ↩
-
The source says literally that beings do not possess two mindstreams. It does not separately identify the two. ↩
-
This compressed stanza can be punctuated in more than one way. The canonical witnesses support taking “nonconceptual, signless” with “minds”; its point is that a deliberately signless mental state must not itself become an abode. ↩